• Folks, if you've recently upgraded or renewed your annual club membership but it's still not active, please reach out to the BOD or a moderator. The PayPal system has a slight bug which it doesn't allow it to activate the account on it's own.

Running carbon + GFH in a 2 little fish phosban reactor

I want to run a reactor in a fuge, but I have space for only one reactor there.
I was wondering if I can have half of it filled with GFH with the top half running carbon between two separators ? I would encase the carbon half with filter sock to prevent mixing and for easy replacements.

Please let me know if this would work.
 
Is your "fuge" also the sump or are they separate??

I run carbon and GFO in separate reactors but both can be run in one reactor, just understand that GFO works better at low flow rates, about 60-100GPH.

If your sump is separate from fuge run the media in the sump.

I use a small skimmer on the outflow section of my fuge to filter water from the fuge connected to my 125 gallon tank.

On my 90 gallon tank I use carbon and GFO in separate reactors,no space for a fuge,the carbon runs at 200GPH the GFO at 80GPH.

HTH
 
I posted a very similar question in the group buy question section. Will tag along here.

OK I am going to ask a semi-newbie question. In the past I have run carbon in my fresh water tanks, Phosban in my salt water tanks, until this year in my nano I used a media bag to help out with filtration. I now have a TLF reactor and am debating on which to run. I currently am using a Seachem SeaGel which is a mix. I understand the downside of mixing them is the carbon does not have the lifespan of the Phosbon media. Are there any other downsides to runnging them together? Could I put a barrier between them so I could change the carbon more frequently? If you could only run one or the other which would you pick?
 
Top