• Folks, if you've recently upgraded or renewed your annual club membership but it's still not active, please reach out to the BOD or a moderator. The PayPal system has a slight bug which it doesn't allow it to activate the account on it's own.

Salifert VS Red Sea Reef Foundation Pro Test Kit

My supply of Salifert test kits was getting low, so I decided to give the new Red Sea Pro test kits a try.
I bought the Red Sea Reef Foundation Pro kit, which includes tests for: Ca, Mg and Alk.

First consideration was the cost, I used BRS since they sell both brands and used "preferred customer" pricing. I did not consider the current 10% discount they are offering on the Red Sea Product.

Salifert, Ca, Mg and Alk kits total: $61.20

# of tests/cost
Ca = 50 @ $ 23.40/kit $.48 ea./per test
Mg = 50 @ $ 24.30/kit $.49 ea./per test
Alk = 100 @ $13.50/kit $.14 ea./per test

Red Sea Reef Foundation Pro Kit: $49.99

# of tests/cost (using refill costs)
Ca = 75 @ $13.00/refill $.17 ea./per test
Mg = 100 @ $12.00/refill $.12 ea./per test
Alk = 75 @ $12.00/refill $.16 ea./per test

There is a real cost savings with the Red Sea kits. But, how did they test out as far as accuracy?

I've done three sets of tests now over the last three weeks.
Salifert
Week 1 Ca = 410 Week 2 Ca = 400 Week 3 Ca = 420
Week 1 Mg = 1350 Week 2 Mg = 1340 Week 3 Mg = 1340
Week 1 Alk = 8.6 Week 2 Alk = 9.3 Week 3 Alk = 8.9

Red Sea Pro
Week 1 Ca = 400 Week 2 Ca = 390 Week 3 Ca = 410
Week 1 Mg = 1360 Week 2 Mg = 1350 Week 3 Mg = 1350
Week 1 Alk = 8.4 Week2 Alk = 9.0 Week 3 Alk = 8.7

I think the numbers speak for themselves. I will continue to monitor these tests until my Salifert kits are used up.

The one caveat here is that the Red Sea kit calculation is determined by taking your end point reading from the plunger in the syringe and deducting it from the 1mL you started with, to determine how much of the titrant was used, i.e. if the reading on the syringe is .37 you used .63, which is the number you need to determine your reading. It isn't hard, but you have to do the math, and I see it as an area for potential human error. The Salifert kit just gives you the reading without the user having to do any additional calculations.
 

TanksNStuff

Officer Emeritus
Officer Emeritus
The two kits were different in all comparisons, but consistently different. With the Red Sea kit, the Ca readings were all 10 lower, Mg were all 10 higher, and alk were almost all .2 lower (.3 on the week 2 test.) Now the question is... which is correct (or more correct than the other)?

You should also take a sample to a LFS next time to compare them all to that.
 
The two kits were different in all comparisons, but consistently different. With the Red Sea kit, the Ca readings were all 10 lower, Mg were all 10 higher, and alk were almost all .2 lower (.3 on the week 2 test.) Now the question is... which is correct (or more correct than the other)?

You should also take a sample to a LFS next time to compare them all to that.

I know, but I don't think, given the fact that all these parameters have a healthy "range", i.e. Alk between 7 and 11 dKH or 8 and 12 dKH depending on who you talk to, a difference of .2 or .3 is relatively small. Also some difference will exist because of how someone determines the "end point" color. I've also seen this much difference between my old and new Salifert kits, since I usually compare the last test of the old with the first test of the new.
 

redfishbluefish

Officer Emeritus
Officer Emeritus
The oh-so-slight difference is well within the error of the test method. This is good stuff to know. Thanks for doing the comparison.
 

TanksNStuff

Officer Emeritus
Officer Emeritus
Yea, and since my Salifert kits are about used up and I've been using Red Sea Coral Pro salt... I might pick these up for my next set.

I was going to get the Hanna CA checker, but not sure that's accurate with everything I hear about them. Shame because I love the alk and phos checkers. :frown:
 
Top